Chetal, who contributed to the paper (produced by the Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association (ILPA), provided her views on the current state of the Home Office’s immigration system, pointing out that its current approach does not help the government to achieve its key objectives.
She notes in her commentary that the policy is grounded in “compliance, enforcement and collaboration”, and is “underpinned by the idea that if you make things miserable for people, for instance, by giving them no access to housing, NHS services or safe employment, they would be driven to vulnerability and they may leave. In reality the policy doesn’t achieve this aim”.
She also dismisses the suggestion that hostile environment checks should be conducted by civil servants explaining that, “doing so has raised concerns that a lack of knowledge and unintended discrimination can cause difficulties for an individual subject to these checks in their day-to-day lives”.
If you would like to read the rest of the Gazette’s report on this whitepaper you can access the relevant piece here.
This information is necessarily of a general nature and doesn’t constitute legal advice. This is not a substitute for formal legal advice, given in the context of full information under an engagement with Bates Wells.
All content on this page is correct as of July 29, 2019.