Professional Discipline

Professional regulators and representative bodies are operating under increased pressure, as expectations and complexities of regulatory requirements brings scrutiny from a number of different quarters.

Bates Wells understands the public interest drivers for professional regulators - in particular, the protection of the public and maintaining public confidence. At the same time, the need to ensure proportionality and “right-touch” regulation can sometimes create a difficult balancing act.

With decades of experience advising professional bodies (both statutory and voluntary) we have not only an in-depth knowledge of the law, but a practical understanding of what’s needed to manage your real-world challenges.

For many years members of our team have been ranked in the legal directories as leaders in the field of Professional Discipline.

How we help

We advise on disciplinary cases and investigations, drawing on our extensive experience in this field; and also acting as legal assessors. We act in relation to all types of investigations, statutory, tribunal and in-house appeals and judicial review, as well as advocacy before all forms of professional regulatory tribunals. We also advise on policy issues and assist with drafting codes, regulations and policy documents.

 

 

Advocacy and representation at the highest level

Many of our partners and team-members are used to litigating at the highest level. We represented the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales ICAEW in the Supreme Court case of Coke-Wallis v ICAEW and in Hill v ICAEW at the Court of Appeal. We also routinely act in disciplinary appeals to the Privy Council.

Acting for individuals

We act for registrants in proceedings against healthcare regulators and professional bodies such as the Nursing and Midwifery Council, the General Social Care Council, the Health Professions Council, the Chartered Institute of Management Accountants and psychotherapy bodies.

“The team is thorough, diligent and responsive, and provides the legal reassurances clients require.”

Professional Discipline, Legal 500 2025

“Bates Wells is always able to take complex data and articulate the key themes that need further exploration.”

Professional Discipline, Chambers 2024

‘The BW team has the specific knowledge and experience needed to deal with regulatory and disciplinary issues in the complex and somewhat specialised area of public sector audit and accountancy.’

Professional Discipline, Legal 500 2024

‘Team members have very thorough knowledge of the issues and are capable of dealing with them in a practical way.’

Professional Discipline, Legal 500 2024

‘Fast turnaround with good guidance that takes into account current law and precedence.’

Professional Discipline, Legal 500 2024
Meet our team
You May Also Be Interested In

Bates Wells clients file judicial review challenge to Public Order Act regulations

Bates Wells clients Lawyers for Animals and Sole Iriart (a campaigner with Camp Beagle) have filed judicial review proceedings challenging the Home Secretary’s use of a “Henry VIII power” to designate the life science sector – including animal testing facilities – as “key national infrastructure” under the Public Order Act 2023. The designation means that …
Read more

Proscribing Palestine Action a ‘terrorist group’ was unlawful, High Court rules in judicial review challenge

A trio of judges in the High Court, including the President of the King’s Bench Division, have ruled that the ‘ban’ on Palestine Action by the Government in June last year under the Terrorism Act 2000 was disproportionate and unlawful.  The judgment was critical of the group, and ruled that “Palestine Action encourages its members…to …
Read more

Online Safety Act update – Ofcom calls for evidence on content harmful to children

Under the Online Safety Act (the “OSA”), Ofcom must produce a report on content that is harmful to children at least every three years. Ofcom has published a call for evidence to support its first report. Background – duties towards children under the OSA The strongest protections in the OSA have been designed for children. …
Read more

Case update: Sex Matters v City of London Corporation

The High Court has refused permission to a judicial review challenge brought by the charity Sex Matters to the trans-inclusive policies operated by the City of London Corporation (the “Corporation”) at the Kenwood Ladies’ Pond and the Highgate Men’s Pond.[1] As a permission decision, it is persuasive rather than binding precedent, but provides some valuable …
Read more

A safer life online for children: Ofcom’s call to action

If your organisation hosts online forums or other communities where users can interact online, you may need to take action under Ofcom’s new codes on child safety. Charities advocating for online safety for children and women will also be interested in the implications of these codes, as well as Ofcom’s current consultation on protecting women …
Read more